Protection against spyware
Looking at all the ads that promise to eliminate all spy applications, a person may wonder why there are many everywhere and the situation is not improving at all. Let me ruin the mood of advertisers and show some of these “holes” in almost all products that we hope to protect.
Speaking of anti-spyware disadvantages, let’s take the concept of “spyware” in the narrow sense to get a change, and telephone “spyware” are simply pieces of software that actually spy on, i.e. they steal invaluable information that you would like to keep private. Let’s leave the advertising software — this nasty set of marketing stuff; advice that some of these “thefts” are not valuable enough. These are key-logging programs that we should combine primarily with all the terms “spyware”. This variation is extremely harmful — this is confirmed by dangers such as the flourishing of fraud by internet banks along with the current epidemic of Trojans containing key-loggers.
In general, most anti-virus features like this … Please do not give up learning. Don’t skip the paragraph. Can you believe that if you are not a technologist, this is not your company? You don’t write this program, you just use it, so what? You probably haven’t created the vehicle you are driving (there may be a few exceptions …). However, you understand (at least in general) what causes it to go away, and you also do not miss to fill the tank or service from time to time. You know what will happen if you don’t. For exactly the same reason, it’s better to know a little about anti-spyware applications installed on almost every computer you use.
We all need to understand this to understand what to expect from these anti-spyware products with trendy names. Their founders and suppliers ensure that this software “will kill all spyware on your computer” (or something like that). First, is complete security possible? Secondly, what happens if we expect a standard anti-spyware program and what exactly it cannot do? To respond to these concerns, we should know how it works.
In general, most work like this: it scans a working system for suspicious code fragments. If the application finds any other, it compares these questionable elements with snippets of code (called signatures) that belong to detected and “intercepted” spy applications. Signatures are stored as a signature — an integral part of any anti-spyware program. The longer the signatures are, the longer the spyware will detect such applications, so that your computer will be better protected.
As long as you update your anti-spyware applications frequently and the machine does not encounter any unidentified spyware, everything will be perfect.
As for me personally, this routine seems and such functions also. But. . . the problem is like 1 with police files — the simple fact that criminals are included does not mean that all criminals have been included in the file.
What about criminals (spy applications) that have not been added to the documents (signatures)? You’ll find plenty of these programs — moreover, a few of them will be with almost no touch foundation. Just like in the case of criminals — some of them have not yet been captured, and some may not be caught — because of the “law of immunity.” Anti-spyware products based on signature foundation analysis will never be able to protect yourself better against these spies. Don’t expect this.
Let’s take a look at these elusive spy applications.
Group 1. Those that were not caught because they are:
1. new. They are composed, published, used (for a very short time), discovered and finally added to tactile basics. Antispyware developers are currently in the vicious circle of an unlimited number of “spy searches” trying to add as many spyware signatures (snippets of code) to the basics as possible — and fast! Faster to overtake your opponents; faster because malware — which is constantly being created and published — does not spread like a fire. That.
2. Written for use.
All these “made to measure”, and if we say “made to measure”, Key-loggers are very unlikely to be detected. As soon as they perform their tasks (information theft, naturally — often through a special computer), they disappear and never see them again. These include key-loggers created primarily for these tasks as espionage.
Problematic applications are easy and not too difficult to compile. Even a regular PC programmer can write a very simple key-logger in a few days. More complicated will take more time, of course, though not too long. Hackers often compile the source code of many key-loggers (easy to locate from the Internet — for people who know where to look) — and receive a completely new, even more unknown signature. If the key-logger could be installed without understanding the victim, it provides the hacker with a fantastic chance to steal any information. When it is possible, you will always be able to use it. The period when a new spy exists, but updates have not yet been published, is the time when hackers make the most profits. Trying to capture them is a hopeless thought; it seems too similar to catching mistakes.
Group 2. “Holy cows”.
No touch base may have their signatures. Here, to a large extent, belong monitoring applications that can also be used for espionage. First, those created by (or for) government agencies — such as the famous Magic Lantern (the idea of this Cyber Knight work). Any item that uses a fundamental signature will not protect it against a regular anti-spyware program that does not discover this type of program. The same situation as with additional tracking applications used by individual agencies. These tracking products “don’t exist” to get an anti-virus using the signature database (however they can exist on almost any computer — including yours)
If you believe that I paint it in black, let’s remember what happened when the code D.I.R.T. (a secret spy tool developed by Codex Data Systems) leaked a few years ago and was discovered on the Internet (only by accident, from this method). After a top secret task, it finally became a secret — but the touch of effective monitoring software was not included in any signature databases. It makes me worried; after this flow of information, no one knows, for some WHO can use it and for what. Imagine that other authorities following the program also enter the network?
Tracking programs for the office or management Supervision is extremely common and easily accessible from the Internet. However, they can be used not only for these completely important purposes. Every tracking program is actually a double-edged sword, because it almost always includes a keylogging module. It is up to the end user to use them, perhaps for espionage. Legitimate monitoring applications are sometimes not included in the signature basics, so you can use an anti-spyware application and be spied on. remove Anti-spyware to get download Norton antivirus with norton product key
Now past (but not only) danger — spy modules integrated with viruses and Trojan applications. Unfortunately, all malware, including viruses, Trojans, worms and other fauna, is “evolving” (due to malicious founders). There are many hybrids that are related to each other, so it is difficult to locate, say, a “clean” virus, such as the one that was used only decades ago. Many species of fauna may have a key-logger — such as (remember this virus). They multiply and multiply, becoming more and more malicious.
What conclusions can we draw from this narrative (sorry if it was too pessimistic)?
Is the potential for protection? Current anti-spyware applications using signature bases — no.
But there is a trend in application development — do not use in any way the investigation on the basis of signature. This strategy is quite promising; this usually means that such applications — already exist — can counteract even new and non-standard spies. You will read about it if you use the link in my signature.
What should we expect from an average anti-virus monitoring application? It will protect against spy applications that “understands”. When it is a specific touch at its base, it protects your computer from this particular program. If the anti-virus uses a touch base, it won’t kill all the spies on your computer — no matter what the seller claims. Don’t expect full security — there’s no such thing anymore.
The only real hope is new technologies. If programmers can’t succeed, they must fight spyware. Try something different.